• Yes Treyarch is the producer of COD 7!!! Nazi Zombies is back baby! Vietnam is the main setting. Name of the game is Call of duty:Black Ops

• WaW is the best cod game yet and I can't wait to see what there going to do next to make IW look like trash. Unlike most people who's first cod game was cod4, mine was cod2 and I have every cod game for the 360 and MW2 has Wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!!!!!!!!! To many campers. On cod waw atleast there aren't nonstop killstreaks going on and another thing is spawn kill. So I think I made my point, waw is AMAZING

• Personally for me I prefer Treyarch to IW. WAW had a much better campaign than MW2 for me, and it was more exciting to play. Multiplayer in MW2 is good, don't get me wrong, but it seems they took it too far with all the perks and kill streaks. As well as that, it was almost a chore to prestige - level 70, really? I found after I bought it, I played on it for about 2 month and haven't touched it since. The only thing which could be improved for COD7 would be the number of guns. In WAW I found I had to use the same guns each time whereas in MW2 you had a variety...

• I totaly agree i was playing at favela and i was standing on the roof next to the hut place closest to the bomb in demoltion which is a? idk but a guy was on the otherside and fucking shot me with a striker roughly 60 feet away. He was on top of the roof with the crops and couch.

• I think MW2 is too much close quarters shotgun Bullshit, i mean i dont recall a soldier being sniped from 10-15 feet away now a days. They make it un realistic. The levels are all indoors and way too small. The levels need to be battle fields huge. And they should step up guns and kill streaks. and if they dont continue a new nazi zombies game mode i highly doubt anyone will buy it. Call of duty vietnam most deff

• Civil War would be awesome but whats the point? every1 using a musket and sabre? really? come on, no one would play. Personaly I think that Vietnam is the right choice so many people died in that war i think they deserve a tribute by making Call of Duty 7 the Vietnam War. Also, they could bring back Nazi Zombies, but they could be called Nams Zombies.

• I hope that it takes place in Veitnam like the rumors are. THAT WOULD BE BEAST!!!! Or even the Civil War would be cool or WWI. Who knows. I just hope it's good.

• I like WaW more that MW2 personally. WaW had a ton of support and the mp wasn't a total frantic mess

• I wasted $60 on Waw and it is not likely that I will waste any more money on Treyarch.

• I have come to the conclusion that no developer is perfect. Sometimes they get it perfect(IW with COD4) and sometimes they stray(IW with MW2). It's really up to the community to re-enforce good ideas with purchases and to deride poor ideas with passes. I for one see that Treyarch improved there game(no pun intended) between COD3 and WaW. I will wait to pass judgment on the next title until I know more facts. I could see it going either way really. Keep an open mind community :^P

• Haha, I read the guy who said he was mad at the COD3 release and how he spent $60 on it... Whether you know it or not, Treyarch is the better developer because they actually CARE about their community and so they provide constant DLC, Constant patches, and information. IW has yet to listen to the community, only provides a very VERY small amount of DLC and they refuse to fix anything that the community on average wanted.

• MW 2 was rushed, the multiplayer is horrible to many hackers and the respawn points are just ridiculous. IW promised the game would be hack proof that backfired and the first day it was out it was already hacked and all over the net, the match making systems does not need to be on pc keep it on 360 and PS3. as far as updates to fix any thing as far as hacking i have not seen any improvement in that area. so in my opinion IW took the billion they made and said F*&$@ you and ran with it. im pretty disappointed with IW i really supported them when MW 1 came out.

• thts great..waiting...

• I wouldn't mind going back to WWII. Modern warfare is just too chaotic.

• I hope they cut ties to Punkbuster. I can't get it any activision games to run under Windows 7 because of Punkbuster flaws. If they still use punkbuster I'm not spending any of my money on the product.

• Treyarch > IW

• and the multiplayer wasn't much better.* <3

• CoD3 was a disaster, sure. CoD5, not the best, but the amount of support was incredible. Things can get only better with Treyarch. This is the complete opposite of IW's trend of "consolizing" the PC community and delivering mediocre content. Even the single player campaign for MW2, where IW is known as an amazing single player team, was designed for players with the intellectual capacity of a stale bagel, and the multiplayer much more. I am a huge fan of Call of Duty 4, and while I hated Call of Duty 3 and wasn't the biggest supporter of World at War, it's still clear to me that Treyarch is treating the community with some respect, whereas IW feels as though it "knows what's best."

• I think Activision is going to tie this into World of Warcraft, and this time around you can sit around in the factories during war time in the United States, help prepare ammunition, and try to help pay for the bills while everybody is still away from World at War. You can then use some of the money you earn during a game session to pay for the monthly subscription. 1 game dollar will equivalent to .0001 real world dollars. It's going to be EPIC!

• Seriously, Im glad IW isnt doing it this year. Modern Warfare 2 was terrible Multiplayer wise. It was rushed.... Too many glitches and kids playing it... Im not saying Treyarch is any better though. But CoD is a dead franchise as far as im concerned.

• Well, Treyarch is making it which means I, nor anyone I know, will be playing it. The COD franchise should be an IW exclusive. Treyarch has only shat on the franchise. I am not an IW fanboy I am still so mad about blowing $60 on COD 3.

TotalComments: 21