Re: Spider-Man
Posted by Anton Gordon at 9:42 AM Jan 12, 2010
What does this mean for video games? Well, Activision certainly can't be happy. The publisher has the rights to the Spider-Man movie franchise through 2017. With Spider-Man 4 originally scheduled for summer 2011, the next Spidey game was likely already in production (although probably at an early stage). If so, that work was a waste of money and man hours. Even if they were just working on concept art, it's useless now as all the characters will look different.
It's possible that there will be another Spider-Man game that's not tied to a film before the next movie comes out, probable even. But in short, a reboot in the movie franchise means a reboot in the game franchise. That's not necessarily a bad thing. The Spider-Man swinging engine was starting to show its age, but now there's time to freshen up the tech, improve the graphics and otherwise keep the generally decent Spidey franchise current.
The talk of the geekosphere may be all about the Spider-Man movies right now, but in today's entertainment industry, what happens on one side of it affects what happens in all the others.





Comments
Interesting. A (slightly) similar situation led to litigation by Activision just a few years back. They bought the Star Trek license and Star Trek films and TV shows were killed shortly thereafter (and only recently resurrected).
Who knows, maybe Activision will use the delay to breathe some life into the Spider-Man games.
Posted 01/12/2010 at 11:22:47 AMI see this as a huge opportunity for Activision. Assuming they already have some work done, and that sony is at square one as far as the movie goes. Activision could pull off the next chapter of the Spiderman franchise without a movie, and still use McGuire and Dunst as voicework. If they made it "Arkham Asylum-y" enough in quality, it would likely outsell the re-boot movie.
Posted 01/12/2010 at 12:30:55 PMSpidey! Just give it up already! Were all sick of spiderman movies. e cig
Posted 01/12/2010 at 10:20:31 PM